![]() Unlike the previous update in 2015, we also didn’t clock faster loading times or speedier response in comparison to the new Chromecast’s predecessor. We also didn’t perceive a noticeable difference between the two devices when viewing p HD content from YouTube, which was delivered much more reliably. Again, that’s mainly because it can be hard to even find 1080p sports content, and moreover, many TV streaming services often have trouble providing a stable enough 1080p stream to take advantage of 60 fps without stutters and resolution adjustments. PerformanceĪs you’d expect, we didn’t notice any difference between our second-generation Chromecast and the new model, even when viewing live sports. That said, a high volume of live sports content maxes out at 720p anyway, so there’s really very little to crow about here. Newer TVs commonly offer a 60Hz native refresh rate (i.e., 60 cycles per second), meaning 60 frames-per-second video offers a frame to fill each moment on screen to provide cleaner movement with less stuttering. ![]() Where the higher framerate could make a very slight difference is for live sports content from streaming services like Sling TV, where the action should theoretically be more fluid for 1080p content when both sides of the streaming pipeline are firing on all cylinders. Since most streaming TV from Netflix, HBO - and finally, Amazon Prime Video - tops out at 30 frames per second, the improved framerate won’t really matter for a lot of what you watch, and much of the content you’ll find on YouTube at higher framerates is offered in 4K resolution. The biggest notable difference here is that the latest Chromecast offers 1080p video at 60 frames per second, as opposed to 60 fps at a max 720p. When it comes to streaming, both Chromecasts max out at 1080p HD resolution (i.e., no 4K video or HDR support). Intuitive streaming has always been the key selling point, and that hasn’t changed. Along with the same basic size and weight, both devices include HDMI connection, Micro USB input, Wi-Fi 802.11ac connection (2.4GHz/5GHz), and an optional Ethernet adapter. A side-by-side comparison reveals a near identical list of features for both the third-generation Chromecast and the 2015 model. What’s new?Īs we alluded to above, apart from an updated look, there’s very little new to report in the latest HD Chromecast. Even if it’s not your primary streamer, which is increasingly the case for many, it’s nice to have a Chromecast around when you need one. Chromecast also allows you to stream any browsing tab in Chrome, and even mirror your desktop. Whether you choose an HD Chromecast or the 4K HDR Chromecast Ultra, the ability to stream almost anything to your TV at the tap of a finger is a huge reason Chromecast is popular, perhaps second only to its affordable price. Left: 2015 Chromecast Right: New 2018 Chromecast Dan Baker/Digital Trends That has always been the key selling point, and it remains unchanged for the third generation. The best reason to own a Chromecast is intuitive streaming (or “casting”) from virtually any streaming app on your mobile device. The app walks you through setup in minutes just plug in, follow the directions, and you’ll be streaming in no time. The closest thing would be Google’s Home app, which is updated fairly regularly and offers features like voice search and integration with other Google Home hardware. Unlike virtually all other streamers, Chromecasts don’t have an interface, per se. (Sorry, we couldn’t help ourselves.) As before, the device comes with a long USB cable and wall adapter for plugging into either your TV or outlet. Other than a minor makeover, the only noticeable design change is that Google has done away with the magnet at the back, so even if your TV’s backside sports a metal facade, you’ll have to dangle your dongle. We’ll also give Google very minor props for making the new box slightly easier to open. ![]() The new device is maybe a sliver thicker, but it feels sleeker thanks to its more modern, matte-plastic shell and monochromatic color scheme (available in “chalk” or “charcoal”). ![]() The third generation follows suit, offering a design that’s strikingly similar to both its predecessor and 2017’s 4K HDR-ready Chromecast Ultra. Released in 2015, the second-generation Chromecast was the first to ditch the flash-drive look for a puck design. (Editor’s note: This review has been updated to add information about new support for Prime Video following Amazon and Google’s truce.) Out of the box And now that it’s got Amazon Prime Video support, it’s finally a comprehensive way to get your (HD) stream on. While there’s not much new about the latest Chromecast, it’s still an easy and affordable way to stream HD video. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |